Showing posts with label lomography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lomography. Show all posts

Saturday, June 26, 2021

Lightweight camera testing (arm brace not shown)


The Lomo Instant Square is light enough to operate with one hand, but I still needed to push the shutter button with my right arm.  It wasn't too bad!

(I've got my right arm in a fancy support, but I can raise a cup of tea to my mouth, or reach up briefly to push a shutter button with one finger.  When I was recovering from reconstructive surgery on my left arm back in 2007, I used an antique twin lens reflex camera with a waist-level viewfinder, which I hung from my neck: I only used my heavily-braced left arm to steady it.  I see the difference now: the shutter controls are all set up for right-hand use!  D'oh!)

Sunday, May 30, 2021

Camera test format variations


I'm still testing the Lomo Instant Square (the version with the glass lenses), now with Instax Mini film (because I ran out of Square).  The view through the viewfinder, which is shared between both formats, remains a bit confusing, and I'm still feeling out where the boundaries are, and am repeatedly surprised by what is in the resulting frame.  But I'm getting the hang of it.  And I'm having a little instant fun, which is always a good thing.

Saturday, May 22, 2021

Camera testing: Lomo Instant Square


Today I tested out my second Lomo Instant Square camera (the first was defective) from Lomography / the Lomographic Society International, loaded with Fuji's Instax Square film.  San Francisco's lovely collection of vintage streetcars seemed like an ideal subject, though they don't stay still for very long, so I had to move fast!

I already like Instax film from my experience with an Instax Wide camera, but wanted a sharper lens than either that camera or the Instax Square camera samples I'd seen.   I decided to give Lomo's model, which has a glass lens AND an attachment to allow it to use the popular Instax mini size, a try.

The images taken in full sun are vivid and well saturated, and my selective testing of the 'decrease exposure' feature helped prevent certain scenes from being washed out.  

(My tests at home erased bright subjects.  I prefer high contrast over bright images generally, though I should NOT have darkened the exposures of the silver Philly streetcar during these tests.  I know that now - I didn't have time for the first print to develop before the train left, so they both use the same setting.  The last image failed to show the colors of a mural in the shade, though that isn't entirely surprising - I didn't set it to the 'increase exposure' setting, which I should have.)  

The images are sharp enough looking, and since focus is a manual slider, I'm taking the blame for the few softer images.  

The only surprise and area I'll need to adjust for is the viewfinder:  the white building in the top row filled the viewfinder when I composed, but the sky in the print is much larger than expected.  This happened with all three distance shots, so I'll adjust my compositions accordingly, and try to work closer to my subjects (which will help the images be more vivid anyway).

Instax Square prints are smaller than Impossible/Polaroid prints, and don't work in Polaroid-compatible cameras.  Instax film is also less than half the cost of Impossible/Polaroid, and still appears to be more vivid and more stable, so it seems a reasonable trade-off!  I'll look forward to having fun with this camera again in the future.  


Tuesday, September 18, 2018

The early version of Lomochrome Purple is fun to experiment with!


The early version of Lomochrome Purple is fun to experiment with! I’m surprised I put some aside for future (now) fun.
#lomography #lomochromepurple